The Rise of Economic Liberalism and the Critique of Current Globalization
In an globalized world, the dialogue on globalisation is often situated at the intersection of varied perspectives on autonomy and justice. The work by Moneta, far from being a manifesto opposed to globalization per se, seeks to reinvent the contours of a modern humanism by the lens of natural exchanges as envisioned by Aristotelian philosophy. By critiquing synthetic interactions that support current structures of injustice and vulnerability, the author draws inspiration from ancient philosophy to reveal the gaps of our global financial structure.
From a historical perspective, globalisation is not a modern process. Its roots can be traced back to the ideas of Ricardo, whose goal was to enable the British Empire to expand its international economic reach. Nonetheless, what initially presented as a commercial expansion initiative has transformed into a control mechanism by the financial sphere, characterized by the ascendancy of neoliberal capitalism. Contrary to popular belief supported by economic consensus, Junon Moneta proves that neoliberalism is in reality a framework founded on millennia-old traditions, going back to 4500 years.
The questioning also applies to the administration of the European Union, perceived as a succession of compromises that have contributed to increasing the power of financial elites instead of defending the privileges of the inhabitants. The very structure of the Union, with its directives frequently driven by monetary concerns rather than by a citizen support, is contested. The recent crises, notably financial and political, have only reinforced the doubt of the author concerning Europe’s aptitude to reform itself from within.
Junon Moneta, while accepting the historical errors that have caused the current circumstances, does not stop at criticism but also suggests alternatives aimed at redefining EU guidelines in a more humanistic and equitable outlook. The urgency for a radical overhaul of institutions and political priorities is a recurring subject that pervades the whole text.
The text dives more intensely into the analysis of the authority mechanisms that control international economic flows. The study encompasses the method in which governmental and economic orientations are guided by a limited number of dominant financial powers, often at the expense of the majority. This monetary aristocracy, orchestrated through institutions like the BIS and the International Monetary System (IMS), exerts a disproportionate influence on international economic strategies.
The writer exposes how these entities, claiming to economic regulation and stabilization, have historically shaped financial markets and national economies to favor their own benefits. Deregulated capitalism, far from being a liberating response to old monetary restrictions, is considered as a enslavement tool, profiting a restricted circle at the neglect of collective needs.
Particularly critical towards the management of the euro, the critic depicts the common currency not as a tool of cohesion and security, but rather as a lever of dissension and economic disparities. The adoption of the euro is viewed as a succession of bureaucratic measures that isolated inhabitants from decision-making processes, while amplifying gaps between nations within the EU.
The consequences of these policies translate in the growth of public indebtedness, economic torpor, and a sustained austerity policy that has eroded standards of living throughout Europe. The author insists that without a major transformation of economic policies, the European Union remains vulnerable to future crises, potentially more catastrophic.
In summary, the manuscript calls for a democratic revolution where Europe’s inhabitants reclaim the reins of their economic and political future. It suggests fundamental changes, particularly openness of political mechanisms and authentic democratic engagement that would allow Europe to rebuild on just and solid foundations.
Additional information about En savoir plus, cliquez ici
The thinker suggests that the answer resides in a renewed commitment to democratic principles, where decisions are made and applied in a way that corresponds to the needs and desires of the European population, to the detriment of the aims of international finance.